73: Fakes, Forgeries and Tax Evasion

Some years ago I wrote a survey of the fake packs known to me at that time for The Playing Card (Vol. 40, 2012). This is an update of the material presented there and expanded into a consideration of other ways of avoiding the duty on cards. As usual, I will concentrate on standard English packs, though I have no doubt there are examples of all kinds of design that could be considered from many different countries. (See also page 40 for a brief discussion of design copies and fakes.)

We have to distinguish between mere copies of a design, even very close ones, and fakes. The former have some kind of distinguishing mark, such as a different ace of spades or redrawn courts, but the latter were meant to be the original and therefore to cheat someone, mostly the tax collectors. Oddly enough, in my experience the close copies of court designs are much more convincing than the fraudulent attempts to deceive. There are some modern Chinese examples, where it's difficult to know whether they are legitimate products or an attempt to cash in on a well-known brand name. In addition, I should mention the matter of reproductions, some of which, sadly, are presented as the genuine article. In this case the target is the collector, not the taxman.

In England the tax was collected by the maker buying the ace of spades for each pack from the appropriate government tax office and it became more and more expensive as the eighteenth turned into the nineteenth century, so the temptation to avoid the tax must have been quite strong in some quarters. There were various ways in which the tax could be dodged. Legal export aces, which cost nothing, could have the word Exportation scratched out and put in packs for home consumption; the corners could be cut off a whole pack rendering them technically waste and a hand-made ace of spades could be provided; second-hand cards could be sold illegally, avoiding the tax on even reused cards. The real act of forgery, though, was to make one’s own ace of spades. This was done by at least two legitimate card-makers in England: Harding (1805) and Henry Wheeler (1836). The proceedings of the trials can be read at www/nationalarchive.gov.uk. The former made fake aces with his own name on and also packs purporting to be by Blanchard. These are particularly interesting because the courts are genuine, but the ace is printed from a wood block. It is odd that the old courts should be used, as their style was out of date by 1805 and the size was not the same as the standard cards of the period.

A fake Blanchard AS with genuine Blanchard courts (possibly by Harding).

The pack below with a Harding AS was in Sylvia Mann’s collection and it is unclear whether the ace is in fact forged, though it does look suspect. The courts, on the other hand, look like genuine Type II courts of the period (1801-05).

There are several different fake ASs, though they all have the number 59 as the die number. The examples below are from Sylvia Mann’s collection and Paul Bostock’s website (A14), which are both different from the one illustrated above and at least the lettering at the bottom is different on each of them (for instance, note the lack of a bar on the first A on the left-hand example). Several aces could have been carved on one block.

In Belgium they were much more careless of trying to replicate the originals. There are two different attempts at Blanchard, one at Gibson & Gisborne and two at Hunt. Two of these were printed from wood blocks with the ace of spades on the same sheet as the courts. There is an example of a Blanchard and a Gibson & Gisborne in the Turnhout Playing Card Museum.

Blanchard fake 2

Gibson & Gisborne fake

There's another Blanchard fake with different courts, but it still has No.59 on the AS.

Blanchard fake 3

Now let's consider the Hunt fakes. The first one has the ace of spades with the continental IIII instead of IV, and number 23 as the die number, and Type II courts, which were rarely used by Hunt.

Hunt fake 1

The other one looks like a tongue-in-cheek, fingers-on-nose snub to the British tax authorities. Whether it was intended as a retaliation to Hunt’s complaints to the British authorities about fake packs from Belgium bearing his name we shall never know, but it certainly doesn’t look like a very serious attempt to fool anyone. The courts are once again a redrawing of the goggle-eyed grotesques based on Hall’s or Stone’s design, so nothing like Hunt’s cards. The number cards are double-ended, which may suggest a later date than the garter ace implies. But the real joke is in the drawing of the AS. Not only is the monogram at the top left GIID, but there’s a bird under the garter at the bottom. Not much of an attempt at a serious fake there! I illustrate the courts and details of the AS.

Hunt fake 2

A short while ago a pack sold by Cartorama was probably an example of a fake pack by Henry Wheeler. The court cards are the same as in a genuine Wheeler Old Frizzle pack I have, but the AS has a Wheeler Ludlow design with the name changed to Hunt. By the time H. Wheeler was making cards, Hunt was styled as Hunt & Sons. Furthermore, the cards have a consistent all-over back design. It looks as though Henry was using up old T.Wheeler Ludlow AS, several years after they were used in the Ludlow packs, but decided to put a different maker's name on them for some reason.

Other ways of tax-avoidance

The other two main ways of avoiding paying tax on cards were (i) cutting the corner off good cards to make 'waste' and providing a hand-made AS or blank, and (ii) selling second-hand cards made up of oddments.

Below is an example of a Reynolds pack with the corners off and a hand-drawn AS.

For a discussion of mixed packs, see page 39.