Question and Answer Games

I was recently persuaded by my 15-year-old grandson to buy a modern game. All the family knows that modern games are fairly low on my priority list compared with anything launched in the 19th century or earlier. However, I succumbed, despite the game being rated 17+. The game, as its promotion suggests, is not for the faint hearted or prudish. It is extremely rude (as my mother would have said) and about as un-PC as you can imagine. Indeed, the grandchildren had to explain some of the terms used to the older players! But it is, frankly, very funny when played with three generations of a family that is, fortunately, not really shocked by anything. When you think that I am of the generation which saw Donald McGill successfully prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act of 1857 for some of his “saucy” seaside postcards, one can get some idea of how much society has evolved in the last 80 or so years!

Above: Cards Against Humanity was first released in May 2011 • www.cardsagainsthumanity.com►

The game comprises two sets of cards – black question cards and a much larger stock of white potential answer or response cards. Ten white cards are dealt to each player. Each player in turn selects a black question card from the top of the pack and reads the question. All the other players select a possible response from their hand of white cards. The questioner then, in turn, reads the question and response selected. After all responses have been given, the questioner selects the best (on whatever criteria he or she decides) and the role of questioner rotates round the group for as long as the game continues, and a winner is determined. Winning, as you can guess, is far less important than the outrageous humour it generates.

I was tempted but cannot really show any of the more extreme questions or responses which include bodily functions, sexual behaviour, contentious statements, celebrities and just about anything judged to be outrageous. However, I have carefully selected four fairly uncontentious examples just to demonstrate the style of presentation.

And similarly a set of possible answers or responses.

Now, I obviously would not use the good offices of the wopc website to promote a modern game for its own sake. There is clearly a reason. I got to thinking this is a great format for a parlour game. Something like this must have been done before; there is very little in the card games business which is entirely original. And sure enough, a little research indentified a much earlier game called Impertinent Questions and Pertinent Answers. The game was launched in the early 1920s by H.P Gibson & Sons Ltd. In its original form in the late 1920s it looked like this • See advertising leaflet

Above: Impertinent Questions and Pertinent Answers by H.P Gibson & Sons Ltd, early 1920s. H.P Gibson and Sons wasted little money on design or production costs when it was first launched.

The original sets of 64 cards carried the same backing motif, card quality and design as another H.P.G game I have written about elsewhere, The History of England►

It is described as “an amusing and entertaining Card Game for Parties” for any number of players. Half the cards contain questions, while the other 32 have answers or responses. Unlike the more modern game each card has two questions or answers, thus:

Unlike “Cards Against Humanity” I could happily have selected any of the sets of questions and responses. They are cheeky rather than outrageous and one can imagine their use in a 1920s drawing room. However, the words and phrases used are interesting in that they reflect the English language as it was spoken at the time and indicate some of the sensitivities of the earlier age.

The game play too is different. Players sit in two equal rows opposite each other. Each pack is shuffled separately, and each player is dealt one question card and one answer card face down. Then in turn, down the row, each player turns the question card and reads the question from the top of their card; the player opposite reads the answer from their card, and so on. The cards are then turned upside down and the second sequence of questions and answers are asked. Play proceeds, according to the instruction leaflet, “keeping the company in a continual roar of laughter”. Shuffling the packs and redistributing the cards means “the combination of Questions and Answers obtainable is almost unlimited, and endless amusement and fun can be obtained”.

The basic version of the game must have been successful as into the 1930s it was given a new design and a promotional boost in various formats. Sadly, Gibson records were lost in December 1940 in the blitz so one can only guess at the scale and longevity of this game as for others from the same source.

Above: Impertinent Questions and Pertinent Answers by H.P Gibson & Sons Ltd, 1930s

The back of the cards too took on a new look although the questions and responses varied very little from the first examples. There were many new ones but very much in the same style.

The game must have been a success because it was worth Gibsons also producing a pocket version, with a different backing design and the use of a new logo.

Nothing very startling in questions or answers, but is it my imagination that this later version showns some sign of moving towards the style of Cards Against Humanity?

Tony Hall, November 2024

Editor's Comment

The evolution from polite card games like "Impertinent Questions and Pertinent Answers" of the 1920s to the provocative and edgy "Cards Against Humanity" reflects cultural and social shifts over a 100 year period. Modern society's embrace of more relaxed, open and unfiltered humour, combined with the influence of media and the internet, has paved the way for content that pushes boundaries.